Online Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia Free Download

Identify Books Conducive To A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Original Title:	Mil plateaux (capitalisme et schizophrénie)
ISBN:	0816614024 (ISBN13: 9780816614028)
Edition Language:	English

A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Gilles Deleuze

Paperback | Pages: 632 pages

Rating: 4.3 | 5317 Users | 214 Reviews

Particularize About Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Title	:	A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Author	:	Gilles Deleuze
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Deluxe Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 632 pages
Published	:	1987 by University of Minnesota Press
Categories	:	Philosophy. Theory. Nonfiction. Politics. Academic

Relation During Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995) was Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris VIII. He is a key figure in poststructuralism, and one of the most influential philosophers of the twentieth century. Felix Guattari (1930-1992) was a psychoanalyst at the la Borde Clinic, as well as being a major social theorist and radical activist.

A Thousand Plateaus is part of Deleuze and Guattari's landmark philosophical project, Capitalism and Schizophrenia - a project that still sets the terms of contemporary philosophical debate. A Thousand Plateaus provides a compelling analysis of social phenomena and offers fresh alternatives for thinking about philosophy and culture. Its radical perspective provides a toolbox for nomadic thought and has had a galvanizing influence on today's anti-capitalist movement.

Translated by Brian Massumi

Rating About Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Ratings: 4.3 From 5317 Users | 214 Reviews

Evaluate About Books A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia

Holy smokes. This is probably one of the most interesting books ever written. It is however very confusing for people who are not familiar with the jargon. It will literally change how you look at the world. The West has embraced a tree-like structure of order and understanding whereas the East has embraced a more rhizomatic understanding. And that's what this book focuses on. The concept of rhizomatic maps. This dichotomy is also the reason why Eastern philosophy is so very different from



Finally, finally, I have finished this book, I was very definitely punching above my weight trying to read this, but overall I have enjoyed it thoroughly, well perhaps not enjoyed the actual reading of it, but this book has provided such a vast resource of ideas for me, I don't regret a single one of the many months that it has taken me to read through this, this is a huge personal achievement for me, now that I have read this I feel like I could read anything.For the most of this book the

This is basically a nonreview: like a restless nomad I would read several pages of one section and then find myself completely unable to go on, and then Id move to the next one. Same for the next chapter and the next. Right from the beginning I knew I had already read too much of this type of writing to have much patience for it. Herere the authors justifying the fact that they affixed their names to the books they write:Why have we kept our own names? Out of habit, purely out of habit. To make

Once again, Deleuze and Guattari give me words to outline the processes and flows of my own thought.I am constantly in a process of deterritorialization, attempting to break free of the systems and stagnations.I am a nomad of thought, of the heart, for thinking is being on the way, becoming.All is interconnected in flowing over, through and across.All lines must work out their motion before they can be detangled from the real. This book is an organ on the way to the complete decoding and

I like Deleuze. A lot. I think, insofar as this is meaningful to say, he is right. But I don't know that he is a good writer. He tends to get off task, run off on these giant tangents that are sometimes charming, but, as this VERY LONG book progresses, get increasingly more tedious and less productive. The becoming-woman discussion is a case in point for me. Deleuze spends more time trying to convince us that he has no intention of insulting transvestites and their accomplishments than he does

This book is pseudo-intellectual garbage. The striations and stratifications of the molar body without organs and deterritorialized flows of jargon were empty of meaning. Crap. Took forever to read it all. 'Anti-Oedipus' had a little thought involved at least.